The Communist Party of China demands the U.S. should disarm. According to Chinese officials, the recent school massacre gave all to understand that one should not wait any longer. The country’s leaders believe that the brutality of the Connecticut shooter will ensure the widest public support for arms reduction, Infowars.com reports with reference to China’s news agency Xinhua.
Xinhua is, in fact, the press service of the current government of China. This organization is responsible for “the work of the State Council and for the reports of the Party on Chinese propaganda and public information services.” In other words, Xinhua is a mouthpiece of Chinese leaders.
Thus, the Chinese government calls Obama “to use the tragedy as a reason to promote the law on the control of weapons.” According to Chinese officials, now is the best time to act so, since the president has just been elected for a second term.
They also note that although previous similar shootings did not to any serious actions, the most recent tragedy may serve an important impetus to revise the system of arms control.”
According to US-based activist and FBI informant Brandon Darby, “the current Chinese government killed from 40 to 70 million people during Mao Zedong’s Revolution. Mao himself said that “political power starts in the barrel of a gun.”
On December 14th, 20-year old Adam Lanza shot 26 at Sandy Hook School in Newtown, Conn.
Twenty of his victims were children from 6 to 10 years. The tragedy triggered a discussion of the
bill on the reduction of weapons.
Americans – Never Give Up Your Guns
By Stanislav Mishin
These days, there are few few things to admire about the socialist, bankrupt and culturally degenerating USA, but at least so far, one thing remains: the right to bare arms and use deadly force to defend one’s self and possessions.
This will probably come as a total shock to most of my Western readers, but at one point, Russia was one of the most heavily armed societies on earth. This was, of course, when we were free under the Tsar. Weapons, from swords and spears to pistols, rifles and shotguns were everywhere, common items. People carried them concealed, they carried them holstered. Fighting knives were a prominent part of many traditional attires and those little tubes criss-crossing on the costumes of Cossacks and various Caucasian peoples? Well those are bullet holders for rifles.
Various armies, such as the Poles, during the Смута (Times of Troubles), or Napoleon, or the Germans even as the Tsarist state collapsed under the weight of WW1 and Wall Street monies, found that holding Russian lands was much much harder than taking them and taking was no easy walk in the park but a blood bath all its own. In holding, one faced an extremely well armed and aggressive population Hell bent on exterminating or driving out the aggressor.
This well armed population was what allowed the various White factions to rise up, no matter how disorganized politically and militarily they were in 1918 and wage a savage civil war against the Reds. It should be noted that many of these armies were armed peasants, villagers, farmers and merchants, protecting their own. If it had not been for Washington’s clandestine support of and for the Reds, history would have gone quite differently.
Moscow fell, for example, not from a lack of weapons to defend it, but from the lieing guile of the Reds. Ten thousand Reds took Moscow and were opposed only by some few hundreds of officer cadets and their instructors. Even then the battle was fierce and losses high. However, in the city alone, at that time, lived over 30,000 military officers (both active and retired), all with their own issued weapons and ammunition, plus tens of thousands of other citizens who were armed. The Soviets promised to leave them all alone if they did not intervene. They did not and for that were asked afterwards to come register themselves and their weapons: where they were promptly shot.
Of course being savages, murderers and liars does not mean being stupid and the Reds learned from their Civil War experience. One of the first things they did was to disarm the population. From that point, mass repression, mass arrests, mass deportations, mass murder, mass starvation were all a safe game for the powers that were. The worst they had to fear was a pitchfork in the guts or a knife in the back or the occasional hunting rifle. Not much for soldiers.
To this day, with the Soviet Union now dead 21 years, with a whole generation born and raised to adulthood without the SU, we are still denied our basic and traditional rights to self defense. Why? We are told that everyone would just start shooting each other and crime would be everywhere….but criminals are still armed and still murdering and to often, especially in the far regions, those criminals wear the uniforms of the police. The fact that everyone would start shooting is also laughable when statistics are examined.
While President Putin pushes through reforms, the local authorities, especially in our vast hinterland, do not feel they need to act like they work for the people. They do as they please, a tyrannical class who knows they have absolutely nothing to fear from a relatively unarmed population. This in turn breeds not respect but absolute contempt and often enough, criminal abuse.
For those of us fighting for our traditional rights, the US 2nd Amendment is a rare light in an ever darkening room. Governments will use the excuse of trying to protect the people from maniacs and crime, but are in reality, it is the bureaucrats protecting their power and position. In all cases where guns are banned, gun crime continues and often increases. As for maniacs, be it nuts with cars (NYC, Chapel Hill NC), swords (Japan), knives (China) or home made bombs (everywhere), insane people strike. They throw acid (Pakistan, UK), they throw fire bombs (France), they attack. What is worse, is, that the best way to stop a maniac is not psychology or jail or “talking to them”, it is a bullet in the head, that is why they are a maniac, because they are incapable of living in reality or stopping themselves.
The excuse that people will start shooting each other is also plain and silly. So it is our politicians saying that our society is full of incapable adolescents who can never be trusted? Then, please explain how we can trust them or the police, who themselves grew up and came from the same culture?
No it is about power and a total power over the people. There is a lot of desire to bad mouth the Tsar, particularly by the Communists, who claim he was a tyrant, and yet under him we were armed and under the progressives disarmed. Do not be fooled by a belief that progressives, leftists hate guns. Oh, no, they do not. What they hate is guns in the hands of those who are not marching in lock step of their ideology. They hate guns in the hands of those who think for themselves and do not obey without question. They hate guns in those whom they have slated for a barrel to the back of the ear.
So, do not fall for the false promises and do not extinguish the light that is left to allow humanity a measure of self respect.
- Stanislav Mishin
Portland News Channel KGW-8 recently reported that the shooter that killed two and then killed himself at Clackamas Town Center mall was not the only arms bearing person in the mall that day. Another, a citizen bearing a glock and a concealed carry permit, was standing at the ready and did not take a shot out of concern for innocent bystanders in his background…
Has the time come where the discussion of allowing teachers to concealed carry on campus is ready to be heard? Perhaps it is well overdue. Regardless, the discussion is starting to get people’s attention.
A recent article following the Connecticut elementary school shooting reports that a St. Louis County Police Chief is recommending that teachers be allowed to carry.
The Obama administration continues its manuevering to cover an operation that placed 2,500 weapons in the hands of foreign criminals. See part II of the interview with Katie Pavlich. Pavlich is the News Editor at Townhall.com and author of the book, Fast and Furious: Barack Obama’s Bloodiest Scandal and its Shameless Cover-Up.
Recently increased publicity related to the shooting death of Trayvon Martin by a neighborhood watch volunteer has given gun control activists a new angle by which to attack an American’s right to protect themselves and their families. This time, however, it seems that the United Nations is joining the attack.
According to Sen. Rand Paul, the U.N. “Small Arms Treaty” will almost surely mandate tougher licensing requirements to own a gun, require the confiscation and destruction of unauthorized civilian firearms, call for a ban on the trade, sale and private ownership of semi-automatic weapons, and create an international gun registry.
Brainwashing – Does that sound like your idea of how you want your public officials to treat you? Propeganda is not what our nation is built on.
See this enlightening speech by NRA Exec Dir. Chris Cox in his address to NRA members this month. Well worth the time.
2012 NRA Members Meeting: NRA-ILA Exec. Dir. Chris W. Cox
“Mr. President, we’ll keep our money and our guns, you keep the change,” NRA-ILA Executive Director Chris W. Cox speaks to thousands of NRA members at the 2012 NRA Annual Meetings in St. Louis, Missouri, “the stakes of this year’s elections couldn’t be higher.” Originally aired 4/14/2012.
An Obama Administration Initiative that resulted in over 2500 weapons literally WALKED across the Mexico border by gun trafficers is now being used to “prove” the need for more US gun control. Translation: Our current White House can give guns to cartels, but they want to take them from law abiding citizens… You decide.